Justia 10.0 Lawyer Rating - Badge
Board Certified - Texas Board of Legal Specialization - Badge
Avvo Rating 10.0 Superb -  Top Attorney Criminal Defense - Badge
AV Preeminent - Peer Rated for Highest Level of Professional Excellence 2017 - badge
Reviews 5 Stars out of 78 reviews - Brian Charles Corrigan - Avvo - badge
Client Champion Silver 2020 - badge

Character Evidence in Murder Cases

There is an old Saying About a Victim in a Murder Case Who had bad or Violent Character

The argument in some murder case by the defense is that that the complainant’s character was so bad that he deserved to die, or in frontier days Texas, “He needed killing.” Our justice system has matured in many ways since that time, but human nature has not. Arguing that a murder was justified based solely on the bad character of the complainant is not allowed, but in some cases, evidence of prior acts of violent behavior can be used to allow the jury to determine who was the first aggressor in a case involving self-defense. Any self-defense case between individuals who know each other require a mastery of character evidence issues along with the self-defense statute. Many of my 17 murder trials and countless Aggravated Assaults involved character evidence. This knowledge is invaluable for my clients who are put on trial for a life and death split-second decision.

Specific instances of the deceased’s violent character are relevant to prove the reasonableness of the defendant’s apprehension of danger if that character was known to the defendant. Thompson v. State, 659 S.W.2d 649, 653 (Tex.Crim.App.1983), Article 38.36 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. However, a 403 analysis would still be necessary to determine admissibility.

The defendant need not be aware of the deceased’s violent character if the evidence is offered to prove that the deceased was, in fact, the aggressor. Thompson, 659 S.W.2d at 653-54. However, the proffered violent act mus explain the conduct of the deceased at the time of offense and not merely prove that the deceased is violent in general or that he is acting in conformity with a general propensity for violence. See Tate, 981 S.W.2d at 193. An example of where an act or threat explains the deceased’s conduct at the time of the offense would be where the deceased had communicated to a third party his desire to harm the defendant, but the defendant never knew about this communication. Tate v. State, 981 S.W.2d 189 (Tex.Crim.App.,1998) (I’m gonna kill that son-of-a-bitch someday threat was never communicated to defendant). Once again, a 403 analysis would still be necessary to determine if the relevant acts are admissible.

Outside of these situations, the rules usually prohibit the offering of specific acts committed by the victims as character evidence to prove that he acted in conformity therewith on a particular occasion. Tex.R.Crim. Evid. 404(a). Tex.R.Crim. Evid. 404(a)(2). The victim’s character for a relevant trait should be proved only by reputation or opinion testimony. Tex.R.Crim. Evid. 405(a). The rules expressly prohibit the use of other crimes, wrongs, or acts as character conformity evidence. Tex.R.Crim. Evid. 404(b). The rules permit the use of specific instances of conduct as direct evidence of character only in cases in which character is an essential element of a charge, claim, or defense. Tex.R.Crim. Evid. 405(b); see Purtell v. State, 761 S.W.2d 360, 369 (Tex.Crim.App.1988) Character as such is almost never an element of a charge or defense in a criminal case. Gilbert v. State, 808 S.W.2d 467, 471 n. 5 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). An example of where character is an essential element in a criminal case is the character of the defendant in the punishment phase of a trial as codified in 37.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. A determination that the victim’s propensity for violence was an essential element in self defense cases involving murder would render rule 404 of the rules of evidence, 38.36 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and all caselaw interpreting these provisions to be meaningless. It would lead to the ridiculous outcome that every violent deed ever done by the deceased would be considered by the jury.

Client Testimonials

“The best Lawyer in Texas and the best attorney for domestic violence cases. I met with 4 to 5 different lawyers and I selected Brian Charles Corrigan. His customer service is excellent. I never had to worry about remembering anything like my dates he always kept me informed. He picked up his phone...


“Brian is the BOMB… after making one bad decision I made an EXCELLENT decision of hiring Brian to represent me. He had all the charges dropped even before the 1st Court Hearing by working with the DA. Additionally he got me an Early Expunction. I met Brian in May 2013 for my case and all the charges...


“10++ stars. This is the most knowledgeable assertive attorney in criminal defense. He is worth his weight in gold!! He took care of my situation quickly and kept me informed the entire time. He is a attorney that truly cares about his clients and that is hard to find. I highly recommend this...


Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Over 20 Years of Experience
  3. 3 Board Certified
Fill out the contact form or call us at 972-722-5300 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message